The Plain Truth: Public Schools Have Become Collectivist Indoctrina...

The Plain Truth: Public Schools Have Become Collectivist Indoctrina...: “Hope and change,” that was the motto of the then presidential candidate Barack Obama, also known as Barry Soetoro.  Little were most peop...

Public Schools Have Become Collectivist Indoctrination Camps!! for Real!

“Hope and change,” that was the motto of the then presidential candidate Barack Obama, also known as Barry Soetoro. 

Little were most people aware that Obama meant that he hoped that he could change America for the worse.

Not only has the American dollar collapsed and the U.S. economy spiraled right down the toilet, he has created more division in this country than slavery and has shredded the Constitution in every way possible.
Some may say that our children can save this country.  Many say it is too late.
For those who are putting their hope in the children of today to save the future of tomorrow, maybe you should start paying attention to what is happening in public schools all across the nation.
John Dryden, a social studies teacher at Batavia High School in Illinois, is facing legal action against him for teaching his students about their 5th amendment right to not incriminate themselves.  This stems from an intrusive questionnaire that Dryden received for his students from the schools office.
In several High Schools across the country, the text books they are handing out to students are rewriting and reinterpreting the Bill of Rights.

As you can see, from this Guyer High School textbook, the second amendment states “The people have the right to keep and bear arms in a state militia.”  This is just an example of brainwashing young impressionable minds in to believing that people do not have right to own firearms unless they belong to a state militia.  Which we all know is nothing remotely close to the truth.
In nearly every school across the country, children are being indoctrinated to believe they have no rights, unless the teachers (government) allows them to.  This is done by random locker searches, car searches, cell phone confiscation, an individuality crushing strict dress code and backpack searches.
States are now constructing federally-mandated databases that will track the behavior and performance of all public school students in America throughout their entire school careers.  According to the New York Post, the Obama administration wants to use the information that is gathered for a wide array of purposes….

The administration wants this data to include much more than name, address and test scores. According to the National Data Collection Model, the government should collect information on health-care history, family income and family voting status. In its view, public schools offer a golden opportunity to mine reams of data from a captive audience.

Our children are also being programmed to accept the fact that they will be watched and monitored constantly.  For example, the U.S. Department of Agriculture is spending large amounts of money to install surveillance cameras in the cafeterias of public schools all across the nation so that government control freaks can closely monitor what our children are eating.
In my own home town, teachers are telling students that if they are going to watch the news, that it has to be CNN or MSNBC.  The schools know that children spend much of their time watching television, so they have taken this opportunity to let the bias mainstream media talking heads do the brainwashing at home when the children are not in the clutches of the public schools.
Most recently, a 5th grade student brought home this worksheet.

This, of course, teaching kids that an individuals interest are not important, obey the government and that the president is always fair and right.
All the examples above, including the fact that government now controls what schools serve for lunch, ought to scare the hell out of you and make you scramble to pull your child out of public schools and home school them.  Statistically, they would be smarter if you did so.
This is a foreshadow of the “bright future” that is ahead of us if we continue to let the American public school system teach our children what to think, not how to think.As Always The Plain Truth!

The Plain Truth: US government claims 100% ownership over all your ...

The Plain Truth: US government claims 100% ownership over all your ...: The United States government claims 100% ownership over all your DNA and reproductive rights. This astonishing revelation has emerged from ...

US government claims 100% ownership over all your DNA and reproductive rights –Is genetic slavery already here?

The United States government claims 100% ownership over all your DNA and reproductive rights. This astonishing revelation has emerged from the fact that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office claims the power to assign ownership of your DNA to private companies and universities who apply for patents on your genes.
To date, more than 4,000 genes have been assigned ownership to corporations and universities by the U.S. patent office. Such an assignment of ownership proves that the government believes it owns 100% of all human genes — you cannot transfer ownership of something unless you first own it yourself.
To date, 20 percent of your genetic code is owned by someone else. About two-thirds of these patents belong to private companies, and one-third belong to universities. The company that owns the most patents is called Incyte, a drug company based in California which “owns” the patents on 2,000 human genes.
Although you have never agreed to sell your body to a corporation, a multitude of corporations now claim ownership over every cell in your body. That ownership makes you a slave to their patent demands, and patent “troll” lawyers are some of the most vicious, blood-sucking demons on the planet who will threaten to drag you into a million-dollar court proceeding if you don’t pay them money. Right now, at this very minute, dozens of corporations can lay claim to your body, and those claims will be 100% upheld in the U.S. court system.

Genetic enslavement is here

Virtually no one is aware of the fact that 20 percent of their genes are currently “owned” by corporations and universities. This ownership is, of course, a form of genetic enslavement that seeks to dominate and control all humans. How, exactly?
Consider this: When you have a child, you are replicating your genetic code. Because your genetic code is 20% patented and “owned” by someone else, the act of having a child is, by definition, an act of genetic piracy that you are committing in violation of the law.
These companies that “own” your genetic code can, if they wish, demand you pay royalties for every child you create. They can even demand that you pay them royalties for your own body replicating cells during processes like healing skin wounds or generating new red blood cells. Your body, in fact, replicates millions of cells each day, causing you to violate the U.S. government’s laws on the theft of intellectual property. You are the criminal!

Corporate patents on human genes – a violation of human rights

This all comes down to a fundamental human rights issue. This is about human rights, women’s rights and reproductive rights. The U.S. Patent office stands in violation of human rights, selling out the bodies of men and women to corporate interests that stand to generate trillions of dollars in profits through DNA testing and treatments.
People like Angelina Jolie actually betray women on this issue by pushing false fear that drives profits into the BRCA1 gene testing industry — an industry that exploits women’s bodies for profit. Jolie is using her celebrity status to spread huge fear about the BRCA1 gene mutation, causing women to rush into their doctor’s offices to get tested… at $3,000 – $4,000 per test thanks to the royalty fees paid to the corporate patent holder.
The U.S. Supreme Court is poised to announce a decision on the issue of gene patenting in just a few weeks (which explains the timing of the recent media push we’ve all witnessed). If the Supreme Court rules against these patents on human genes, it would mean a multi-trillion-dollar loss to the human gene patenting industry which hopes to collect ongoing royalties on gene testing and gene research for the next thousand years.
By the way, the very idea that the Supreme Court can “rule” on this issue is also a fraud. No court has ownership over your genetic code. No government authority has a higher power than the Creator of the universe and the creative, life-giving forces that brought you into being. Your DNA is yours alone, and any claim over it is null and void from the start.

What else can be patented? Leaves, hands, birds and even green beans

If the Supreme Court upholds the absurd notion that human genes can be patented by corporations, then there’s no end to where this all goes: corporations could file patents for grass, fruits, birds, ants, insects and even other human body parts such as ears, hands and feet. Your eye color could be patented because that’s controlled by genes, too.
Once all these things that already exist in nature are patented, you can be hauled into court and forced to pay exhorbitant fines and fees for having them on your property. Got some ants invading your yard? That’s piracy, you criminal, because those ants are patented!
If this sounds absurd, note carefully that Monsanto has successfully sued farmers using the exact same logic. Their patented GMO seeds were blown by the wind into farmers’ fields, so Monsanto sued those farmers in court — and won! The farmers’ crimes? “Stealing” Monsanto’s intellectual property.
Make no mistake that the entire point of seeking patents over things like human genes, animals and plants is so that the patents can be used as weapons of control against the masses. The patenting of human genes is, at every level, a crime against humanity. And all those who support this industry — like Angelina Jolie — are supporting criminals who exploit the bodies of men and women for profit.
Say NO to patents on human genes! Say NO to patents on animals! Say NO to Monsanto and NO to the insanity of government-enforced intellectual property laws that violate universal justice.
P.S. The date mentioned in the graphic below has already passed, but the message is powerful nonetheless:

The Plain Truth: A “Thank You” Letter To Obama From A Single Texas ...

The Plain Truth: A “Thank You” Letter To Obama From A Single Texas ...: “Have you ever sat and watched your children eat and you eat what was left on their plates when they were done, because there wasn’t enou...

A “Thank You” Letter To Obama From A Single Texas Mom Goes Viral!

“Have you ever sat and watched your children eat and you eat what was left on their plates when they were done, because there wasn’t enough for you to eat to?”

Those are just some of the words in Yolanda Vestal’s, a single mother from Texas, letter to Barack Obama.
With an economy that has done nothing but get worse and worse over the last 5 years, gas prices double what they were in 2008, only about 1/3 of the country employed, more taxes than most people can keep track of, energy and grocery bills skyrocketing and now Obamacare threatening to leave most Americans in poverty, people are really starting to feel the squeeze.
To address these problems, Yolanda Vestal posted a letter on her Facebook page, and what started out as a way to vent, became a way for others to share frustration over Obamacare and the out of control spending of Barack Obama and the Obama family. The single mother of two blasted the president for increased taxes and lavish vacations. The post has received over 63,000 “shares.”
This is the letter-

Dear President Obama,
I wanted to take a moment to say thank you for all you have done and are doing. You see I am a single Mom located in the very small town of Palmer, Texas. I live in a small rental house with my two children. I drive an older car that I pray daily runs just a little longer. I work at a mediocre job bringing home a much lower paycheck than you or your wife could even imagine living on. I have a lot of concerns about the new “Obamacare” along with the taxes being forced on us Americans and debts you are adding to our country. I have a few questions for you Mr. President.
Have you ever struggled to pay your bills? I have.
Have you ever sat and watched your children eat and you eat what was left on their plates when they were done, because there wasn’t enough for you to eat to? I have.
Have you ever had to rob Peter to pay Paul, and it still not be enough? I have.
Have you ever been so sick that you needed to see a doctor and get medicine, but had no health insurance because it was too expensive? I have.
Have you ever had to tell your children no, when they asked for something they needed? I have.
Have you ever patched holes in pants, glued shoes, replaced zippers, because it was cheaper than buying new? I have.
Have you ever had to put an item or two back at the grocery store, because you didn’t have enough money? I have.
Have you ever cried yourself to sleep, because you had no clue how you were going to make ends meet? I have.
My questions could go on and on. I don’t believe you have a clue what Americans are actually going through and honestly, I don’t believe you care. Not everyone lives extravagantly. While your family takes expensive trips that cost more than most of us make in two-four years, there are so many of us that suffer. Yet, you are doing all you can to add to the suffering. I think you are a very selfish and cold hearted man, who does not care what is best for the people he was elected by (not by me) to represent, but more so out for the glory of your name attached to history. So thank you Mr. President, thank you for pushing those of us that are barely staying afloat completely under water and driving America into the ground. You have made your mark in history, as the absolute worst and most hated president of the United States. God have mercy on your soul!
Sincerely,
Yolanda Vestal
Average American    As Always The Plain Truth!

The Plain Truth: The Countries Top Hospitals Won’t Be Treating Many...

The Plain Truth: The Countries Top Hospitals Won’t Be Treating Many...: The eventual outcome of Obamacare would be a two-tiered medical system – one system for the wealthy, and another system for most Americans....

The Countries Top Hospitals Won’t Be Treating Many Obamacare Patients!

The eventual outcome of Obamacare would be a two-tiered medical system – one system for the wealthy, and another system for most Americans.
Obamacare health plans, Medicare and Medicaid recipients will get one level of care akin to what socialized medicine affords in Britain and Canada. Meanwhile, those with private insurance off the exchanges will have a completely different experience.
It seems the new system is already taking shape, considering the revelations that many of America’s best hospitals aren’t letting in the Obamacare masses.
You see, the Obamacare plans are risky for insurance companies. They don’t have good data on who will actually show up and buy plans. It’s assumed by the biggest insurance companies that the clients in the Obamacare pool are likely poorer, with larger medical problems. They assume these are the people that couldn’t get insurance because of preexisting conditions.
To hedge their risks, insurance companies are asking providers to accept smaller reimbursements. Therefore, only the hospitals and doctors that need business are accepting the smaller Obamacare reimbursements. The best hospitals, the ones that don’t need more business, decide to opt out, effectively shutting their doors to Obamacare patients.

A Dim Future
The system is so convoluted and byzantine that you pretty much need a PhD to decipher it. First, the hospitals negotiate with insurance providers. The insurers get reduced pricing from the hospital in exchange for sending in large numbers of clients. These networks of hospitals and doctors are the result of intense negotiations, and they’re usually built out over years.
Now, as a result of Obamacare, things are changing. Most of the firms assume the young and healthy people that are needed to balance the Obamacare budget won’t show up. So they’re asking providers to accept smaller and smaller reimbursements.
But if you’re the Mayo Clinic, the Cleveland Clinic or Cedars Sinai, for instance, you just don’t need to accept smaller reimbursements – or you can’t afford to. So you opt out. This is also how Medicare works, and it’s no coincidence that if you walk in the front door of the Mayo Clinic, you’ll be greeted by a sign that says “We don’t accept Medicare.”
A Watchdog.org study of the top-tiered hospitals found they’re not easily accessible to the Obamacare insurance exchange participants. For example, in Ohio, the Obamacare exchange includes a dozen insurance companies – yet the state’s premier hospital, the Cleveland Clinic, accepts only one of those dozen firms. If you’re buying on the exchange in Ohio, make sure you read the fine print!
Last year, I had a cardiac ablation, and I wanted to go to the best hospital in the country for the procedure. I chose Cedars Sinai in Los Angeles and had an excellent experience. They treat you like you’re taking a trip to the spa. But if you’re buying from the exchange in California, you’ll find that only one insurer is accepted by Cedars.
So if you want the best doctor, stay out of Obamacare. Want the best specialists? Stay out of Obamacare. Want the best hospital? You get the picture. Sadly, this same advice is true for Medicare, which is suffering the same fate. Medicare, which all Americans must participate in by government edict, is facing drastic reimbursement cuts to provide money for Obamacare.
Of course, the changes won’t all come in a day or even a year. But Medicare Advantage Plans – which are highly rated by the seniors that participate in them (such as my Mom and Dad) – are targeted for extinction by Obamacare. It’s proving the old adage that you can’t have something for nothing.
Foolish people believe that the siren song of socialism will pay in the end. But if you want the best medical system in the world, it costs money. If our country doesn’t want to pay for it, then it will morph and change until we have a sub-class healthcare system. And in the end, the wealthy will get great care even if they have to leave our shores or hire concierge doctors. It’s sad that Obama’s socialism is sacrificing a once-great system on the altar of false equality.As Always The Plain Truth!

The Plain Truth: Government shutdown delayed treatment for 30-year-...

The Plain Truth: Government shutdown delayed treatment for 30-year-...:      Michelle Langbehn is a 30-year-old mother who was diagnosed with stage 4 sarcoma (a rare form of cancer), when her daughter was only e...

Government shutdown delayed treatment for 30-year-old mother with stage 4 cancer!!

     Michelle Langbehn is a 30-year-old mother who was diagnosed with stage 4 sarcoma (a rare form of cancer), when her daughter was only eight weeks old. She was told she would only survive a year.

She stopped her chemotherapy because she was waiting to hear from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) about whether or not she would be accepted into a clinical trial for patients with sarcoma.

The government shutdown delayed her answer for almost a week, only to find out that she was not accepted into the NIH trial. She was outraged that the shutdown wasted valuable time that she could have used trying to get into another clinical trial. In the meantime, she discovered that she has a new sarcoma growth in her collarbone. Michelle is still hopeful and refuses to let her daughter grow up without a mother. She is attempting to get accepted in other trials.

Perhaps this let-down was a blessing in disguise. Michelle has already suffered through nine months of chemotherapy, several surgeries and two rounds of radiation. This clinical trial could have exposed her to more toxic chemotherapy and/or radiation, assaulting her immune system and weakening her organs. Hopefully, another door will open for Michelle and for countless other frightened cancer patients that rely on this broken medical system to save their lives. Most likely, it won't come from their oncologist, and it won't be covered under their insurance plan, but powerful alternative treatments are available, and safe, and have saved countless lives.
The following is a list of just a few existing natural cancer treatments:

Gerson Therapy
The Gerson Therapy is a natural treatment that triggers the body's remarkable ability to heal itself by using an organic vegetarian diet, raw juices, coffee enemas and powerful natural supplements. For more information, see Gerson.org and Gersonmedia.com (also available on Netflix).

Essaic Tea
Essiac tea is a four-herb tea that supports the immune system and can be taken without any side effects. It kills free radicals that cause cancer and purifies the liver and kidneys of toxins. The Essaic formula includes the following four botanical herbs: sheep sorrel, burdock, slippery elm and Indian rhubarb. See Herbalhealer.com for more information.

Modified Citrus Pectin
Modified Citrus Pectin (MCP) is a form of pectin derived from citrus fruits which has been modified for better absorption, which enhances its healing properties. A university study published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute (December 2002) found that MCP reduced tumor growth, angiogenesis and metastasis in tumors containing galectin-3. Galectin-3 is a protein on the surface of cells that acts like a sticky hand, helping other cells to bind to it. Cancer cells have many more galectins than regular cells and can multiply very quickly, forming clusters of cells that become tumors. MCP surrounds these 'sticky' cells and prevents them from sticking together and forming tumors.

Medicinal Mushrooms
Ganoderma reishi, turkey tail, chaga and shiitake mushrooms are just a few of the powerful cancer-fighting mushrooms that exist and have been used in cancer treatment in Japan, China, Russia, eastern Europe and other countries for decades. These powerful fungi contain betulinic acid, which is toxic to cancer cells. In addition to their anti-tumor properties, they are proven to alleviate the side effects of chemotherapy and boost the immune system.

Hydrogen Peroxide and Oxygen Therapies
It has been clinically proven that cancer cells cannot grow in the presence of oxygen. As more oxygen is introduced, cancer spreads slower and the cancer cells die off. There are various types of oxygen treatments, including oxygenation therapy, hyperoxygenation (using a hyperbaric oxygen chamber), bio-oxidative therapy, oxidative therapy, autohemotherapy and hydrogen peroxide therapy.

Currently, there is a lot of buzz about hydrogen peroxide therapy, but great care must be exercised. The 3% hydrogen peroxide sold in drug stores is not safe to ingest and can be dangerous. Only 35% food-grade hydrogen peroxide can be used in this therapy, which should be carefully done with the advice of a professional. As Always The Plain Truth!

               

The Plain Truth: Pay-Per-Mile: The Latest Privacy Concerns Whats Re...

The Plain Truth: Pay-Per-Mile: The Latest Privacy Concerns Whats Re...: It’s no secret that America’s highways have seen better days. In fact, the United States Highway Trust Fund has received four bailouts sinc...

Pay-Per-Mile: The Latest Privacy Concerns Whats Really Going On!

It’s no secret that America’s highways have seen better days. In fact, the United States Highway Trust Fund has received four bailouts since 2009, yet the fund is nearly bankrupt, and the American highway system is beginning to crumble.
Lawmakers are scrambling for a solution, and many want to turn to a pay-per-mile tax. Currently, Americans pay just over $0.18 per gallon in gas tax, and that number hasn’t increased in 20 years. But as cars become more fuel efficient and Americans spend less at the gas pump, politicians are searching for a way to increase tax revenue and finance the Highway Trust Fund.
The pay-per-mile tax would require cars to carry a “black box” on the dashboard that tracks miles driven. Several states have already completed or will soon launch test programs, despite Congress’s failure to approve a $90 million test program last year. Oregon, for example, is testing the program on the vehicles of 5,000 volunteers.
Many see the proposal as the best way to tax transportation. Adrian Moore, vice president of policy at the Reason Foundation, stated, “This is not just a tax going into a black hole. People are paying more directly into what they are getting.”
But this “solution” also has many questioning its effectiveness – as well as its potential privacy concerns.
The Metropolitan Transportation Commission in the San Francisco Bay Area said, “There is no need for radical surgery when all you need to do is take an aspirin. If we do this, hundreds of millions of drivers will be concerned about their privacy and a host of other things.” Instead, the commission believes Congress should increase the federal gas tax – including an additional tax on fuel efficient cars, like hybrids.
Meanwhile, in Nevada, the search is on for affordable technology that will track the miles without keeping track of the time or the car’s location. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Nevada voiced the concerns of many on its website: “It would be fairly easy to turn these devices into full-fledged tracking devices… There is no need to build an enormous, unwieldy technological infrastructure that will inevitably be expanded to keep records of individuals‘ everyday comings and goings.”
And privacy concerns aren’t limited to Nevada residents. Mark Perry, of the American Enterprise Institute, wrote, “It would force us to surrender our privacy. Each day more and more of us are required to tell government agencies more and more about ourselves. Do we really want the government collecting data about driving habits?”
The Final Word
I’ll admit that the federal gas tax isn’t working. Fuel efficient vehicles go longer between fill-ups and reduce the amount drivers pay at the pump. Congress is scared to increase the gas tax because of already-high gas prices. And the gas tax hasn’t kept up with inflation over the past 20 years.
The pay-per-mile tax seems like it could resolve all of these issues. However, we can’t create one set of problems in order to fix another. We shouldn’t compromise our privacy in order to resolve a tax revenue problem. The government does need to fix the highway system and fund the Highway Trust Fund – but not at the expense of our right to privacy.
In pursuit of the Truth, The Plain Truth!